Max webber contribution to sociology8/8/2023 ![]() ![]() More articles are needed that demonstrate how female as well as male sociological theorists interpreted the development of modern society and the same subjects very differently. Although contributions like these are valuable, this article argues that it is also important to provide university teachers and students with literature and articles that do not “only” describe differences in what subjects early female and male sociologists explored. ![]() Further, women wrote about women, children, immigrants and the poor – subjects that tended to be rather absent in the men's work. More women than men wrote empirical, evidence-based articles. They argued that women's work was different to that of men. ![]() ( 2002) explored sociological writings by women and men between 18. They described each woman's contribution to sociology and also some differences among these female sociologists and male sociologists concerning their choice of aspects to be observed. Lengermann and Niebrugge-Brantley ( 1998) presented 15 women sociologists of the 19th and early 20th centuries. However, some important contributions have been made in this field. Limited efforts have been made over time to place female and male theorists' writings in juxtaposition with each other to demonstrate how their writings and theories, due to their different experiences, differ from each other. There is a body of literature problematizing the lack of women's accounts in classical sociology. However, adjusting the syllabi to achieve gender balance, does not necessarily make students aware of how female and male scholars speak from their own situated experience and standpoint (c.f., Smith, 1987, 1999, 2005). One way to address these issues is to incorporate the writings of female scholars into all syllabi in classical theory and thereby solving the “problem.” An equal representation of female and male authors could result in a more nuanced picture of the social world during the growth of modernity and issues such as politics, labor, and economics (c.f., Thomas and Kukulan, 2004). Approaching only a masculine view of classical sociological theories and concepts – that are presented as non-gender specific and universal – affects the conceptions of sociology as a science that students acquire (Stanley and Wise, 1993 Magdalenic, 2004, 2015). Consequently, for several decades, it has been argued that higher education students are presented with sociology content based on only male voices. This was despite their work being largely invisible or “written out” of history as some authors suggest (Lengermann and Niebrugge-Brantley, 1998). ![]() Women were also major players in the development of sociological thinking and social theory. In several respects, these male classical scholars were pioneers in their fields. In prologs and back-cover blurbs for classical literature in sociology, Karl Marx, Emilé Durkheim, and Max Weber are described as “pioneers,” “trailblazers,” and as the most significant social thinkers for understanding social life and societal development (e.g., Giddens, 1973 Morrison, 1995 Hughes et al., 2003 Calhoun et al., 2012). Rather than achieve equal numbers of female and male authors, this will ensure that students are able to explore and understand classical sociology through the lens of different gendered experiences during their studies. As a consequence, universities should pay careful attention to gender distribution in their syllabi. Their various interpretations illustrate how experiences are situated and that there is no complete and objective knowledge. The article contributes a comparative analysis on how five authors, three female and two male, described and interpreted the transition from traditional to modern society through their gendered experiences. Further, the aim is to shed light on the consequences this might provide for the teaching and learning of classical sociology. The aim of this article is to encourage discussion of how early female and male sociological theorists' descriptions and interpretations on the development of modern society were shaped by their own gendered experiences. However, limited efforts have been made to place female and male theorists' writings in juxtaposition with each other in order to demonstrate how their writings and theories differ. There is a body of literature problematizing the lack of women's accounts in what is called classical sociology. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |